How Unconstitutional Laws, Illegitimate FCC Guidelines, and Suppression of Science Sparked a Public Health Crisis

Few years in modern history have reshaped America more covertly and profoundly than 1996. That was the year three interconnected moves—the Telecommunications Act (with its notorious Section 704), fraudulent FCC “safety” guidelines, and the suppression of Public Law 90-602—set us on a collision course with a chronic disease epidemic. Far from mere oversights or “outdated regulations,” these actions formed a deliberate trifecta of deception orchestrated to benefit the wireless industry at the expense of the American people.

  • Unconstitutional Laws: Section 704 stripped local communities of their right to oppose cell tower placements on health grounds, violating both the First and Tenth Amendments.
  • Illegitimate FCC Guidelines: Developed without medical or environmental expertise, focusing only on thermal effects and ignoring a mountain of evidence on non-thermal biological harm.
  • Suppression of Public Law 90-602 (passed in 1968): This Congressional mandate ordered continuous research into all forms of “electronic product radiation.” Instead, research was sidelined and effectively blocked, leaving Americans vulnerable.

The result has been a massive surge in cancers, neurological disorders, autism spectrum disorders, ADHD, and other chronic illnesses—all aligning suspiciously with the unprecedented expansion of wireless technology after 1996. This post aims to lay out the entire picture—from the original studies that got buried to the solutions that could set America free from this health crisis.


1. 1996’s Unconstitutional Laws: How Section 704 Gagged America

Clinton Signs Away Our Rights

When President Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act into law, Section 704 effectively prohibited local governments from rejecting cell towers based on health concerns. This is more than policy; it’s an affront to constitutional rights:

  • First Amendment: Localities and citizens lost the right even to express health-based objections.
  • Tenth Amendment: States and municipalities were stripped of their sovereign powers to protect residents.

Instead of “streamlining infrastructure,” Section 704 delivered a gift to telecommunications corporations, ensuring no health-based roadblocks could stand in their way. As a result, cell towers sprouted across neighborhoods, schools, and parks—often with little recourse for citizens, no matter how strong the evidence of harm.

Why We Need Trump to Repeal Section 704

Now, decades later, it’s imperative for the Trump administration to repeal or heavily amend this section to restore local communities’ constitutional rights. Without reclaiming local authority, Americans will continue to be forcibly exposed to unchecked RF (radiofrequency) radiation—even when mounds of scientific studies link it to serious health risks.


2. Illegitimate FCC Guidelines: The Thermal-Only Myth

A 1996 Gift to Big Telecom

Simultaneously, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued “safety guidelines” based on thermal effects alone. These guidelines:

  1. Ignored Non-Thermal Risks: By 1996, evidence was already overwhelming that non-thermal effects—such as DNA breaks, oxidative stress, and neurological impacts—posed serious health threats. The industry’s own studies, from Dr. Henry Lai (DNA damage) to Dr. Martin Pall (mechanisms for autism and neurological disorders), provided chilling details.
  2. Bypassed the EPA: Public Law 90-602 assigned the Environmental Protection Agency to research and regulate radiation-emitting products. Yet, oversight was given to the FCC—an agency with no medical or environmental background. Engineers, not doctors, set standards that were suspiciously “friendly” to telecom expansion.
  3. Branded as “Safe”: The public was told not to worry; if your phone or tower doesn’t heat your body significantly, it can’t hurt you. This thermal-only paradigm has since been proven scientifically bankrupt.

Fraudulent from the Start

These guidelines were never just “outdated.” They were fraudulent from Day One because numerous peer-reviewed studies (including some funded by the telecom industry itself) already indicated that living organisms can be harmed by RF exposure below thermal thresholds. Even the telecom industry’s own “war-gaming memo” emerged—exposing how corporations plotted to discredit scientists like Dr. Henry Lai who found evidence of DNA damage in the 1990s.


3. Suppression of Public Law 90-602: Collusion on a Grand Scale

A Law Congress Forgot

Passed in 1968, Public Law 90-602 mandated that agencies continuously study and regulate electronic product radiation. This included everything from microwave ovens to cell phones. However, in 1996:

  • The EPA’s role was stripped.
  • The FCC, aligned with corporate interests, took over.
  • Funding for real RF research dried up, making it easier for industry to claim “insufficient evidence” while they expanded wireless networks.

Bigger Than Big Tobacco

The scale of this collusion dwarfs even the tobacco and chemical industries’ past deceptions. Telecom is an ultra-lucrative juggernaut with deep political influence. By effectively neutering federal research obligations, the industry ensured no robust oversight would challenge its thermal-only dogma.


4. The Net Effect: A Public Health Crisis

Over the past few decades, a tsunami of chronic diseases has engulfed America:

  1. Cancer: Just the Beginning

    • NTP (National Toxicology Program) and Ramazzini Studies: Show “clear evidence” of carcinogenic activity at exposure levels comparable to everyday cell phone use. Rats developed gliomas and cardiac schwannomas, mirroring low-grade human tumors.
    • Genetic Profiling Breakthrough (2024): Tissue analyses revealed morphological similarities between rat tumors and human gliomas, weakening the industry’s “animal studies don’t apply to humans” argument.
  2. ADHD and Autism

    • Yale Mouse Study: Pregnant mice exposed to cell phone-level radiation gave birth to offspring with memory problems and hyperactivity, mirroring human ADHD.
    • Dr. Martin Pall’s Research: Outlines mechanisms (e.g., voltage-gated calcium channels) through which RF exposure could contribute to autism spectrum disorders.
  3. Neurological Disorders

    • Children struggling with eye contact and social interaction could be the canaries in the coal mine. When a child’s bioelectric environment is already compromised by incessant RF, any additional insult—like vaccines or chemical exposures—may tip them into a permanent state of neuro-disruption.
  4. Industry Attacks on Science

    • Henry Lai discovered DNA damage from low-level RF in the 1990s. The industry’s internal memo revealed they planned to “war-game” his findings—smearing reputations, defunding critical research, and burying scientific truth.

5. Aligning Perfectly with the Expansion of Wireless Tech

What’s more telling than the skyrocketing rates of chronic illnesses is how precisely they coincide with the explosive growth of cell phones, Wi-Fi, and cell towers after 1996. If we had no scientific studies but just noticed this correlation, it would already be suspicious. But we do have scientific studies—thousands of them—showing biological harm from radiofrequency radiation below thermal thresholds.


6. RFK Jr.’s Role: A Beacon of Hope at HHS

A Longstanding Advocate

Now that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is poised to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, a ray of hope shines on this decades-long conspiracy. RFK Jr. has:

  • Challenged the FCC in court, winning a historic ruling that forced the agency to confront evidence of non-thermal harm.
  • Exposed regulatory capture in other industries, showing a track record of fighting corporate malfeasance.
  • Championing the call to update or overhaul fraudulent guidelines and restore lawful, evidence-based policymaking.

Enter President Trump

But the biggest move requires Presidential action: Repealing Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act. Without that, local communities remain powerless, and the FCC’s anti-health stance remains enshrined in federal law.


7. A Call for President Trump to Act

Step 1: Repeal Section 704

Just as Bill Clinton signed it, President Trump can be the one to undo it. Restoring communities’ rights to challenge cell tower placements on health grounds is essential. This is also about reviving the First and Tenth Amendments as they apply to public health.

Step 2: Mandate Safer Wireless Tech

Just as the automotive industry was forced to adopt catalytic converters and meet emissions standards, the wireless industry must be compelled to:

  • Develop Emissions Controls: Innovative antenna designs (e.g., interferometric arrays, beamforming) that minimize radiation into the user’s body.
  • Adopt Light-Based Technologies: For short-range communications, visible or infrared light can replace certain radiofrequency applications.
  • Space-Based Solutions: Leveraging developments like Elon Musk’s satellite constellations to shift cell tower burdens off residential neighborhoods, if done responsibly and with thorough safety considerations.

A bold presidential mandate could spark a new era of tech innovation, akin to how clean-air regulations spurred the automotive industry. Not only would this better protect public health, but it would revitalize American engineering and manufacturing, creating new jobs and leading the world in safer wireless solutions.


8. A Golden Age of Health and Innovation

Lifting the veil of deception will do more than prevent illness:

  1. Healthier Children: Fewer ADHD and autism diagnoses if we reduce constant EMF assaults on developing brains.
  2. A Cancer Decline: If we remove or drastically reduce the daily RF bombardment, we might finally see a reduction in tumor rates.
  3. Medical Breakthroughs: Recognizing non-thermal RF effects can open doors to therapies like TheraBionic, approved for inoperable liver cancer, and accelerate research on electromagnetic treatments for other diseases.
  4. Global Leadership: America could become the world’s pioneer in safe, advanced communication technologies, leading to a healthier populace and a robust tech sector.

9. Putting It All Together: The Urgent Roadmap

  1. Fully Repeal or Amend Section 704: Restore local governance rights.
  2. Overhaul FCC Guidelines: Incorporate non-thermal risks, set lower SAR limits, and rely on medical research, not engineering convenience.
  3. Enforce Public Law 90-602: The FDA and EPA must resume (and expand) research on RF radiation, fulfilling their original congressional mandates.
  4. Prosecute Industry Misconduct: Investigate corporate “war-gaming” strategies under potential RICO statutes, holding accountable those who knowingly endangered public health.
  5. Mandate Safe Tech: Encourage or require development of lower-emission or light-based wireless technologies, setting a new global standard.

Conclusion: The Time for Truth Is Now

America has lived under the shadow of the 1996 trifecta for too long, with Section 704, fraudulent FCC guidelines, and suppressed science fueling an epidemic of chronic disease that includes cancer, ADHD, and autism. We now have the evidence, and we have a potential champion in RFK Jr. at HHS. But real change demands that President Trump step forward and repeal Section 704, returning our constitutional rights, and then mandate an era of safer, more advanced wireless tech.

It’s time to lift this decades-long veil of deception.
It’s time to restore local governance, update our safety standards, and unleash a wave of innovation that places public health first.
Above all, it’s time for America to wake up and demand accountability for the damage done since 1996.

The future can be a golden age—healthier children, less cancer, booming tech innovation—but only if we confront this trifecta of deception head-on. For the sake of our families, our communities, and generations yet to come, we must act now.


Contact & Further Reading

  • RF Safe – Educating the public on EMF risks and practical safety measures.
  • John Coates – Founder, Phone: 727-610-1188
  • Public Law 90-602 – U.S. Congressional mandate from 1968 for continuous radiation research and public protection.
  • Key Studies:
    • NTP (National Toxicology Program) Study – Showed clear carcinogenic effects at real-life RF exposure levels.
    • Ramazzini Institute – Replicated NTP’s results at lower intensities, linking RF to tumors in animals.
    • Yale Mouse Study – Prenatal RF exposure caused ADHD-like symptoms in mice.
    • Dr. Henry Lai – Demonstrated DNA breaks from RF radiation; subsequently targeted by industry “war-gaming.”

Remember: A healthy America is a prosperous America—and we can achieve it if we demand the truth and reject the 1996 trifecta of deception once and for all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *