MBFC’s RF Safe entry assigns a “Medium Credibility” rating while simultaneously conceding that RF Safe is “Mostly Factual” and that RF Safe links to legitimate studies. The downgrade is then justified primarily through broad labels—“selective citation,” “one-sided interpretation,” “alarmist framing,” and a “potential conflict of interest”—plus “conflict” with major health authorities such as the FDA, […]
Category Archives: QuantaDose Press Releases
By John Coates, Founder of RF SafePublished: January 25, 2026 In the fast-evolving world of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) safety research, credibility isn’t built on alignment with entrenched institutions—it’s earned through decades of rigorous, evidence-based advocacy. For nearly 30 years, RF Safe has been at the forefront of highlighting the inadequacies of thermal-only safety guidelines […]
The blog post from SaveSilver.us recounts the origin of “constitutional silver ounce slabs” as a heartfelt family project that began as a simple organizing activity at a kitchen table, evolving into a vision for preserving and standardizing pre-1965 U.S. 90% silver coins (dimes, quarters, and half dollars) as collectible, ounce-class units https://savesilver.us/blog/the-origin-story-of-constitutional-silver-ounce-slabs-savesilver-us.php#what-made-this-feel-real-to-a-kid It emphasizes treating […]
Why removing categorical FDA safety assurances was the scientifically responsible move: high‑certainty animal cancer evidence, non‑thermal biological effects, and a court‑recognized failure of thermal‑only assumptions. RFK Jr. Was Right to Remove FDA’s Blanket Assurances on Cell Phone Radiation Safety In January 2026, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), led by Secretary Robert […]
RF Safe has published multiple detailed responses on their site and X, arguing that MBFC’s rating is unwarranted and based on shallow analysis. Key points from their rebuttals: On Factual Errors: They highlight MBFC’s initial mistakes (e.g., ownership, lack of study links) as evidence of rushed assessment, which MBFC later fixed but didn’t fully upgrade […]
A familiar dismissal shows up whenever the National Toxicology Program (NTP) results are raised: the exposures were “too high,” so the findings don’t matter. That line is misleading in two important ways. First, the NTP did not study one “extreme” dose—it studied multiple whole‑body Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) levels (including a “lower level” group) and […]
HHS updates under RFK Jr. involving removal of FDA webpages that denied cell phone radiation risks: Recent reports confirm that, as of mid-January 2026, the FDA has indeed removed certain webpages containing outdated conclusions that dismissed health risks from cell phone radiation. This action aligns with HHS directives under Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to […]
In mid-January 2026, reporting indicated that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) directed a new study on electromagnetic radiation and health effects, and that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) removed webpages containing “old conclusions” about cellphone radiation in order to identify knowledge gaps, including those tied to emerging technologies. What […]
In the early days of consumer cell phones, public anxiety about “radiation” created a predictable market opportunity: products that promised protection. Many of them were simple stickers or small patches marketed to block “up to 99%” of emissions—often placed over the earpiece, where consumers intuitively believed the risk was highest. The problem is that intuitive […]
If your objective is to reduce exposure in a practical, physics-consistent way without increasing phone transmit power, the “best” anti-radiation case is typically the one that meets three criteria: Directional shielding (not full enclosure) so it can act as a barrier between you and the phone during a call. Minimal antenna interference risk (no designs […]