The GWEN Studies Predate the FCC Safety Guidelines: How Did They Ignore the Risks?

The Science Was Already There, But It Was Ignored

The Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) studies conducted in the early 1990s revealed serious biological effects from radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure, yet the FCC’s safety guidelines, finalized in 1996, completely ignored these findings.

This raises two critical questions:

1. How could the FCC, a regulatory agency with no health expertise, set RF exposure limits that ignored pre-existing research on neurological damage, immune dysfunction, and cancer risks?
2. How could Congress pass Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, effectively stripping communities of their right to oppose wireless infrastructure, when scientific evidence of harm was already available?

The answer is simple: corporate and military interests suppressed the science to fast-track the wireless industry’s growth, ensuring that safety regulations wouldn’t interfere with profits or national security programs.

This article will expose:

• How the GWEN studies documented serious health risks before the FCC’s RF exposure limits were set.
• The role of military and telecom industry influence in shaping fraudulent “thermal-only” safety guidelines.
• Why Section 704 of the Telecom Act was a deliberate attack on democracy, designed to prevent local governments from acting on this research.

This is not just a regulatory failure—it is a premeditated deception that has fueled a chronic disease crisis and put millions of Americans at risk.

---

1. The GWEN Studies: Evidence of RF Harm Before the FCC’s Guidelines

1.1 What Were the GWEN Studies?

The Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) was a U.S. military project designed to ensure secure military communications during a national emergency, including after a nuclear attack.

To maintain reliable low-frequency (LF) and very-low-frequency (VLF) communications, tall transmission towers were built across the U.S. These towers emitted continuous electromagnetic fields (EMFs) that blanketed large geographic areas.

Because of public concerns about RF radiation exposure, scientific studies were conducted in the early 1990s to determine potential health effects.

1.2 Key Findings from the GWEN Studies (1993)

The National Academy of Sciences (1993) assessment of GWEN and similar RF systems found:

• RF radiation alters nervous system function, brain chemistry, and electrical activity.
• Calcium ion disruption in nerve cells occurs at low, non-thermal exposure levels.
• Blood-brain barrier permeability increases at RF exposure levels of just 2 W/kg.
• Immune system function is impaired by chronic RF radiation exposure.
• Cancer risks were identified, but researchers claimed “more study was needed.”

These studies proved that RF radiation had biological effects beyond heating—yet the FCC completely ignored them when setting its safety guidelines just three years later.

---

2. The FCC’s 1996 RF Safety Guidelines: Scientific Fraud?

2.1 How the FCC Ignored the GWEN Research

• The FCC’s 1996 RF exposure guidelines were based on thermal effects only—completely disregarding non-thermal biological effects like those documented in the GWEN studies.
• The FCC’s guidelines were finalized three years after the GWEN studies were published, meaning the agency had access to this research but deliberately chose to ignore it.
• Instead of considering the neurological, immune, and carcinogenic risks identified in GWEN research, the FCC adopted standards that only protected against tissue heating.

This is regulatory negligence at best and scientific fraud at worst.

2.2 Why Did the FCC Ignore the Science?

The FCC is not a health agency—its purpose is to regulate telecommunications, not protect public health.

By the mid-1990s, the telecommunications industry and military had powerful incentives to suppress evidence of RF radiation risks:

1. The U.S. military relied on RF technology for secure communications and weapons systems.
2. Telecom companies were investing billions in wireless expansion and didn’t want regulatory hurdles.
3. Updating safety standards to account for non-thermal effects would have made it nearly impossible to deploy nationwide wireless networks.

The FCC’s RF exposure limits were shaped by corporate and military interests, ensuring that regulation wouldn’t slow down the rollout of cell towers, Wi-Fi, and 5G.

---

3. Section 704 of the Telecom Act: How They Silenced the Public

3.1 The 1996 Telecommunications Act and Section 704

At the same time the FCC’s fraudulent safety guidelines were being finalized, Congress passed the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which included Section 704—one of the most unconstitutional laws ever signed.

3.2 What Section 704 Did

• It made it illegal for local governments to reject cell towers based on health concerns.
• It stripped communities of their right to use scientific evidence (like the GWEN studies) to oppose wireless infrastructure.
• It effectively silenced public debate about RF radiation risks.

3.3 How Could Section 704 Be Passed With This Research Available?

• The telecom industry had overwhelming influence over Congress, pushing the false narrative that RF radiation was safe.
• The FCC’s thermal-only guidelines gave lawmakers a convenient excuse to ignore the real health risks.
• The military’s involvement in RF technology meant that keeping research suppressed served national security interests.

This was not just about the wireless industry—it was about ensuring military and corporate control over the nation’s communication infrastructure without public interference.

---

4. The Fallout: A Chronic Disease Epidemic Built on a Lie

4.1 The Consequences of Ignoring the Science

By ignoring the GWEN studies and adopting fraudulent RF safety limits, the FCC and Congress unleashed an unregulated health experiment on the entire U.S. population.

Since the late 1990s, chronic illnesses have skyrocketed, including:

• A surge in cancer rates, particularly brain tumors and thyroid cancer.
• Rising cases of ADHD, autism, anxiety, and depression, aligning with RF radiation’s impact on the nervous system.
• Immune system disorders and autoimmune diseases, consistent with RF-induced immune suppression.
• Increased neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s and dementia, which correlate with RF-induced oxidative stress and calcium ion disruption.

4.2 The Cover-Up Continues

Despite overwhelming evidence of harm:

• The FCC has refused to update its guidelines since 1996.
• The EPA was defunded from studying RF radiation, ensuring no independent research could contradict the industry’s claims.
• Lawsuits against the FCC (like RFK Jr.’s 2021 case) have exposed regulatory fraud, but no policy changes have been made.

The result? The American public remains in the dark about the real dangers of wireless radiation.

---

5. What Needs to Happen Now

5.1 Enforce Public Law 90-602

• This law mandates ongoing radiation research, yet the federal government is ignoring it.
• Congress must reinstate funding for independent RF radiation studies.

5.2 Repeal Section 704

• Communities must regain the right to oppose cell towers based on health concerns.
• The First and Tenth Amendments must be restored to allow public debate on RF safety.

5.3 Investigate the FCC for Regulatory Fraud

• Congress must investigate how the FCC ignored the GWEN studies when setting its RF exposure limits.
• The FCC must be stripped of its authority over health-based exposure standards.

5.4 Demand New Safety Standards

• RF exposure limits must include non-thermal biological effects.
• Independent scientists—not industry lobbyists—must set new guidelines.

---

Final Thoughts: A Call to Action

The scientific evidence existed before the FCC set its RF exposure limits.

The government knew the risks before Section 704 was signed into law.

This was not a mistake—it was a deliberate suppression of science to protect corporate and military interests at the expense of public health.

We have the proof. We have the law. Now, we need the will to demand change.

#FollowTheLaw #RepealSection704 #InvestigateTheFCC #EnforcePublicLaw90-602

The wireless industry created a public health crisis—but we still have the power to expose the truth and protect future generations. The fight starts now.