The Consensus App Exposes the Truth: Only 13% of Studies Claim Cell Phone Radiation is Safe

For years, the telecom industry and regulators have told the public that cell phone radiation is safe. But what happens when we examine the actual scientific consensus, including industry-funded research?

Thanks to AI-powered tools like the Consensus.app, we can now analyze the full body of peer-reviewed research on this issue—and the results are alarming.

According to the app’s comprehensive analysis, only 13% of scientific studies conclude that cell phone radiation is safe. This isn’t just an abstract concern—it means that, across all available scientific literature (including studies funded by the telecom industry), the best-case scenario is that cell phones have an 87% chance of being unsafe.

Would you accept an 87% chance of danger in any other aspect of your life? If a medication only had a 13% chance of safety, would you give it to your child?

It’s time to stop pretending this issue is up for debate. The data is clear.

What is Consensus.app?

Consensus.app is an AI-powered search tool designed to analyze and summarize peer-reviewed scientific literature. Instead of relying on headlines, opinion pieces, or cherry-picked industry studies, Consensus aggregates findings from multiple scientific papers and presents a quantified consensus on important topics.

For example, when asked, “Is cell phone radiation harmful to health?”, Consensus analyzed 15 relevant studies and categorized their findings as follows:

• 33% of studies say YES, cell phone radiation is definitively harmful.
• 33% say POSSIBLY, meaning there is significant evidence of risk.
• 20% have mixed findings, meaning there is some risk, but more research is needed.
• Only 13% conclude NO risk at all.

What This Means: A Rigged Safety Narrative

This is where it gets even more concerning:

The 13% of studies claiming safety almost certainly include industry-funded research, meaning that even within a body of literature that includes pro-telecom bias, the overwhelming conclusion is that cell phone radiation is not safe.

If telecom-funded studies are included in this dataset, it’s likely that many of these “safe” findings were influenced by industry interests, which historically fund studies designed to downplay risk rather than seek unbiased truth.

This means that, if we remove the likely industry-funded studies, the percentage of independent research concluding cell phones are dangerous could be even higher.

Significant Research on RF Radiation and Health Risks

There is a substantial body of research indicating potential health risks associated with cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. Major studies include:

• Interphone Study
• Hardell Group Studies
• CERENAT Study
• U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study
• Ramazzini Institute Study
• REFLEX Project
• BioInitiative Report
• Research by Dr. Henry Lai

These studies collectively point toward an increased health risk from cell phone radiation and highlight the absurdity of dismissing these potential dangers.

Furthermore, misclassification of RFR risk has been a barrier to life-saving medical advancements. A recent review noted:

📢 “Existent literature points toward a yet untapped therapeutic potential of RF-EMF treatment, which might aid in damaging cancer cells through bioelectrical and electromechanical molecular mechanisms while minimizing adverse effects on healthy tissue cells.”

This could be one of the most crucial scientific issues of our time. RF radiation research is demonstrating biological interactions beyond thermal effects, completely debunking the outdated assumption that non-ionizing cell phone radiation is biologically inert except for its heating properties.

RF Radiation is Already Being Used in Cancer Treatment

One of the most compelling cases against the “thermal-only” argument is the FDA-approved TheraBionic treatment.

• TheraBionic employs RF radiation at power levels up to 1,000 times lower than those emitted by cell phones.
• It has been shown to effectively treat inoperable liver cancer through non-thermal interactions.
• These effects include resonance effects, disruption of cellular signaling, and potential immune system modulation.

This proves that the traditional assumption that RF radiation is only dangerous at heating levels is completely false.

📢 If RF radiation at non-thermal levels can disrupt cancer cells, why are we still pretending cell phones, which emit stronger signals, are biologically harmless?

The Path Forward: Demand Change Before It’s Too Late

Now that the scientific consensus is overwhelmingly clear, we must demand immediate action. Here’s what needs to happen next:

🚨 1. Repeal Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act

• Communities must regain the right to regulate wireless infrastructure based on health risks.

🚨 2. Update FCC Safety Standards

• Regulations must account for non-thermal biological effects, not just outdated thermal models.

🚨 3. Restart the NTP Cancer Research

• The Biden-Harris administration halted the National Toxicology Program’s cancer research despite its findings of RF-induced tumors. This must be reinstated immediately.

🚨 4. Invest in Safer Alternatives

• LiFi technology (light-based wireless communication) must be prioritized.
• Space-based telecom should replace excessive ground-level RF saturation.
• Shielding and safer antenna designs must be adopted to reduce exposure.

📢 We have the technology to reduce risk—what we need is the will to act.

Final Thoughts: The Science is No Longer in Question

The Consensus.app has provided a data-driven reality check on cell phone radiation: Only 13% of studies support the idea that it is safe.

That means the overwhelming majority of research suggests some level of risk—ranging from possible harm to definitive biological damage.

This is not a conspiracy theory, and it is not fringe science—it is what the peer-reviewed literature says.

So the question is no longer “Is cell phone radiation safe?” The real question is: Why are we still pretending that it is?

🚨 Join the movement: #TrumpRepeal704 🚨

Let’s demand truth, transparency, and technology that prioritizes safety over corporate profit.

📢 We don’t need to gamble with 13% odds. We need to protect our children, our families, and our future.