From Personal Tragedy to Public-Health Advocacy: The Story, Innovations, and Mission of RF Safe

In the realm of public-health advocacy, few stories resonate with the emotional depth and scientific rigor behind RF Safe. Founded by John Coates, RF Safe traces its inception to a life-altering tragedy—the loss of Coates’s daughter, Angel Leigh Coates, to a rare neural tube defect (NTD) at birth. What began as a father’s heartbreak evolved into a relentless investigation into electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and a pledge to inform the public about the potential dangers of unchecked radiation exposure.

But Coates’s journey didn’t stop at raising awareness. RF Safe went on to pioneer cutting-edge solutions—from specialized maternity wear to the Vortis Antenna—challenging obsolete regulatory norms and reshaping safety standards in the wireless industry. Today, amid growing concern over outdated guidelines and suppressed research, RF Safe continues its mission: defending the public’s right to safe, science-based technology and empowering families with knowledge to protect their children.


A Father’s Grief and the Seed of RF Safe

Angel Leigh Coates: The Catalyst for Change

In 1995, John Coates experienced a devastating loss: his firstborn daughter, Angel Leigh, succumbed to a neural tube defect shortly after birth. Rather than become mired in grief, Coates chose to harness his sorrow as fuel for a larger cause. He began asking hard questions about environmental factors that could trigger congenital anomalies, focusing on how EMFs might affect embryonic development.

The Farrell et al. (1997) Revelation

Coates’s search led him to a groundbreaking study by Farrell et al. (1997), which documented a heightened incidence of neural tube defects in chicken embryos exposed to EMFs—eerily similar to Angel’s condition. While avian physiology differs from humans, the findings pointed to two critical insights:

  1. Biological Vulnerability to EMFs
    Even low-level EMF exposure may disrupt early cellular signaling or growth patterns, underscoring how developing organisms—especially embryos—could be disproportionately vulnerable.
  2. Translational Concerns for Human Health
    Though chicken-embryo data isn’t direct proof of identical outcomes in human pregnancies, Farrell et al. raised urgent questions about non-thermal EMF effects on human embryonic tissues.

For Coates, this study validated his concerns, blending a personal tragedy with a broader scientific issue. Emboldened by the evidence, he founded RF Safe in 1998 to systematically expose the hidden risks of electromagnetic radiation and advocate for safer wireless technology.


The Building Blocks of RF Safe

1. Education

From the beginning, RF Safe aimed to bridge the gap between complex scientific findings and everyday consumer choices. By compiling peer-reviewed research, offering practical safety tips, and demystifying scientific jargon, RF Safe sought to ensure parents, expectant families, and the public could make informed decisions about wireless technology.

2. Advocacy

Coates recognized that individual awareness wouldn’t suffice without institutional change. RF Safe pushes regulatory bodies like the FCC and FDA to adopt updated safety guidelines that account for non-thermal effects, fosters transparency in research funding, and supports robust scientific inquiry into EMF risks—particularly during prenatal development.

3. Market-First Solutions

To meet the immediate need for safer wireless use, RF Safe introduced a range of products:

  • Maternity Belly Bands: Shield developing fetuses from direct EMF exposure.
  • Air-Tube Headsets: Minimize RF conduction to the ear.
  • Anti-Radiation Phone Cases: Direct harmful radiation away from the user’s body.

These offerings reflect RF Safe’s core ethos: empower consumers with technologies that reduce unnecessary radiation without sacrificing performance.


 Challenging Outdated Norms—The Vortis Antenna Breakthrough

The Problem: Isotropic Exposure

Early mobile phones relied on isotropic antennas, which radiate signals uniformly. While beneficial for broad coverage, they also maximized radiation near the user’s head. Making matters worse, the FCC’s “isotropic rule” essentially mandated this design, leaving little room for safer antenna alternatives.

The “Impossible” Solution: Vortis Antenna

Inspired by wave interference studies and driven by his promise to Angel, Coates developed the Vortis Antenna (originally called the “no-wave,” an interferometric array antenna). This design tackled isotropic radiation head-on by:

  1. Reducing Radiation Near the Head
    Interference patterns canceled out harmful radiation closest to the user, preserving signal strength to the network.
  2. Boosting Accessibility
    Traditional isotropic antennas often disrupted hearing aids. The Vortis Antenna’s directional approach significantly lowered interference, aligning with ADA goals for inclusive technology.

Initially, the Vortis Antenna violated the FCC’s isotropic rule, making it commercially “noncompliant.” Yet, by 2003, the FCC revisited its regulations concerning hearing aid compatibility, acknowledging the potential benefits of directional antennas. This opened the door for designs like the Vortis, effectively overturning the isotropic rule and marking a pivotal win for consumer safety.

A Promise Kept, Without Financial Gain

Despite its enormous commercial potential, Coates chose not to profit from the Vortis Antenna. He transferred patent rights to telecom expert Jim Johnson, motivated solely by his vow to protect the public. This decision allowed broader industry adoption of beamforming and directional antenna technologies, fundamentally reshaping how phones balance signal quality and health considerations.


From Safer Phones to Far-UVC Frontiers

RF Safe’s legacy extends beyond solving the isotropic issue:

  • Advocacy for Stricter SAR Guidelines: Coates’s team developed a SAR comparison database, giving consumers clearer insight into the radiation levels of popular cellphones.
  • Continued Scientific Dialogue: RF Safe supports research into the non-thermal biological effects of EMFs—DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological changes—to inform policy and public understanding.
  • Emerging Innovations—Far-UVC
    Recent patents (e.g., US11700058B2) explore Far-UVC frequencies (200–230 nm) for dual-purpose data transmission and disinfection. This technology may revolutionize both connectivity and public health by killing airborne pathogens without harming human tissues. Coates sees it as the next logical step: merging health-first principles with the future demands of 6G and beyond.

Advocacy in the Face of Regulatory Failures

Unresponsive FDA and FCC

Despite Public Law 90-602 requiring the FDA to monitor electronic radiation, the agency has effectively stalled comprehensive RF research (e.g., defunding National Toxicology Program studies after they found “clear evidence” of carcinogenic risks). Meanwhile, the FCC still clings to thermal-only guidelines set in the 1990s, ignoring the court rulings and scientific advances that emphasize non-thermal hazards.

Why This Matters for Parents and Communities

  • Rising Autism and Neurological Disorders: Studies like Farrell et al. (1997) highlight potential embryonic vulnerabilities. More recent research links RF exposure to ADHD-like symptoms and increased neurological risks.
  • Local Control Stripped: Under Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act (1996), communities can’t challenge cell tower placements on health grounds—further perpetuating a cycle of unchecked expansion and outdated safety standards.

RF Safe’s mission now includes fighting for the repeal or amendment of laws that silence public health concerns and re-empowering local governments to uphold community-level safety.


A New Vision for Wireless Standards

RF Safe’s policy recommendations—backed by decades of research—are clear:

  1. Update FCC Guidelines
    Mandate the inclusion of non-thermal biological effects in safety limits. The courts have already criticized the FCC’s outdated stance, and it’s time regulators listen.
  2. Restart NTP Research
    Reallocate funding to the National Toxicology Program, enabling further investigation into the long-term carcinogenic and neurological impacts of RF exposure.
  3. Overhaul the Telecommunications Act
    Amend Section 704 to restore local authority, ensuring communities can demand safer infrastructure and hold telecom companies accountable.
  4. Force the FDA to Follow Public Law 90-602
    This 1968 mandate wasn’t optional. The FDA must “plan, conduct, coordinate, and support” research and safety standards relevant to modern wireless technologies—especially for children and vulnerable populations.

The Legacy of Angel Leigh Coates

Angel Leigh’s story underpins RF Safe’s unwavering commitment to evidence-based advocacy. What began as a father’s quest for answers has grown into a community-driven platform that educates, innovates, and influences policy. By exposing the risks of EMR, championing safer product designs, and pushing for regulatory reform, RF Safe upholds Angel’s legacy: a reminder that every life is precious, and every child deserves a safer world.


A Moral Imperative for Change

RF Safe’s journey echoes a fundamental truth—true progress in technology is measured not just by speed or convenience but by how well it safeguards human life. From the heartbreak that launched a one-man crusade to the invention that toppled the FCC’s isotropic rule, John Coates and RF Safe have spent over two decades making wireless technology safer for everyone.

Today, as society accelerates toward 5G, 6G, and beyond, the lessons of RF Safe ring louder than ever:

  • Transparency in Research: We must continue studying RF radiation’s non-thermal impacts, especially for prenatal and early-childhood exposures.
  • Policy Overhaul: Outdated laws and guidelines must align with modern science and public health priorities.
  • Informed Consumer Choices: Education empowers individuals to reduce unnecessary exposure and demand safer tech products.
  • Innovation with Compassion: From belly bands to Far-UVC communication, the goal is clear—technology should enhance life, not endanger it.

For more information, or to join the fight for safer wireless, visit www.rfsafe.com or contact John Coates at 727-610-1188.

In memory of Angel Leigh Coates:
May her legacy guide us toward a future where knowledge eclipses ignorance, and where love fuels innovation that safeguards every child’s tomorrow.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *